1. the gemara in chullin 94a forbids geneivas daas, deceiving a person, even a non jew, and the case there is not even a spoken lie, it is letting the other person walk away with the wrong impression. so is geneivas daas exactly the case where a business never technically lies but designs the message so the customer believes something false?

2. the shulchan aruch in choshen mishpat 228:6 paskens that a seller may not mislead in business, and if the item has a defect he must tell the buyer. how far does that duty go? does a seller have to fix wrong impressions the buyer made on his own, or only the ones the seller created?

3. the everyday cases: a permanent limited time sale that never ends, an inflated original price crossed out next to the real one, packaging that makes a product look more premium than it is, stock photos that look nothing like the actual item. which of these cross into geneivas daas and which are just normal marketing that no reasonable person believes?

bottom line: where is the line between selling and geneivas daas?